<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>tomroyal.com &#187; lens</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.tomroyal.com/tag/lens/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.tomroyal.com</link>
	<description>nothing of any consequence, now with added cats</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 12:15:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Cheap and cheerful</title>
		<link>http://www.tomroyal.com/blog/2009/05/09/cheap-and-cheerful/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomroyal.com/blog/2009/05/09/cheap-and-cheerful/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 17:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Royal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[135mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Carl Zeiss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[D80]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[f/3.5]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jena]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[M42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomroyal.com/?p=637</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lewisham has a number of pawn shops, ranging from the heavily fortified &#034;gold chains by the dozen&#034; variety to others that are more like Aladdin&#039;s Caves full of junk. And, when passing one of the more junky ones the other day, I spotted this: It&#039;s a Carl Zeiss 135mm f/3.5 lens &#8211; a little old, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lewisham has a number of pawn shops, ranging from the heavily fortified &#034;gold chains by the dozen&#034; variety to others that are more like Aladdin&#039;s Caves full of junk. And, when passing one of the more junky ones the other day, I spotted this:</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-638" title="Carl Zeiss 135mm" src="http://www.tomroyal.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/jenazeiss.jpg" alt="Carl Zeiss 135mm" width="500" height="330" /></p>
<p>It&#039;s a Carl Zeiss 135mm f/3.5 lens &#8211; a little old, and with a huge thumbprint on the front element (now removed), but nonetheless obviously worth more than the £9 it was selling for. I snapped it up just to see if I could get it to work, and happily it did:</p>
<p><a title="Watching the window by tomroyal, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomroyal/3515993922/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3070/3515993922_e3beb3d38f.jpg" alt="Watching the window" width="500" height="335" /></a></p>
<p>In fact, as it turns out it&#039;s amazingly sharp &#8211; certainly as good as my Nikkor 24-85mm zoom, and possibly better. Using it isn&#039;t easy &#8211; it needs an M42 to Nikon adapter, which is stiff and hard to fit, it won&#039;t focus beyond ten feet or so because of the Nikon mount distance, and there&#039;s no metering, autofocus or automatic aperture control &#8211; but still, on the D80 it&#039;s the equivalent of a 200mm telephoto for £15 all in. Bargain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomroyal.com/blog/2009/05/09/cheap-and-cheerful/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Less flare</title>
		<link>http://www.tomroyal.com/blog/2009/01/19/less-lens-flare/</link>
		<comments>http://www.tomroyal.com/blog/2009/01/19/less-lens-flare/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:51:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Tom Royal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photos]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Series]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[F/1.8]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens flare]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.tomroyal.com/?p=488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I really should learn to use a camera properly; you know, buy a book or something. Instead I&#039;ve been slowly working things out over the years, which is satisfying but often frustrating in a &#034;wish I&#039;d known that when I was in&#8230;&#034; kind of way. Case in point: lately I&#039;ve been having problems with lens [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="People watching people by tomroyal, on Flickr" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomroyal/3209850353/"><img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3328/3209850353_1a531ce287.jpg" alt="People watching people" width="500" height="333" /></a></p>
<p>I really should learn to use a camera properly; you know, buy a book or something. Instead I&#039;ve been slowly working things out over the years, which is satisfying but often frustrating in a &#034;wish I&#039;d known that when I was in&#8230;&#034; kind of way. Case in point: lately I&#039;ve been having problems with lens flare.</p>
<p>Having attended a <a title="Hillary and Chetan's wedding" href="http://flickr.com/photos/tomroyal/sets/72157611774442314/" target="_blank">lovely wedding</a> at which I was pretty much unable to photograph anyone inside because of the dark (can&#039;t afford an external flash to bounce and my zoom lens is large enough to obscure the built-in one) I decided to buy a simple, bright lens. In the end I picked up a really old <a title="Nikon E 50mm f1.8" href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/raster/3147700349/" target="_blank">Nikon E 50mm f/1.8</a>, and it&#039;s great: almost twice as bright as the zoom, and easy to focus because it was made in the days that auto-focus didn&#039;t exist. It&#039;s also tiny &#8211; on the D40 it barely protrudes beyond the prism/flash housing &#8211; and stupidly light. Oh, and cheap. Cheap is good.</p>
<p>The problem, though, is flare. Point my <a title="Big. Ugly. Designed for film. Works great." href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/tomroyal/119732966/" target="_blank">modern zoom lens</a>, with hood, pretty much anywhere other than directly at the sun and you&#039;ll get a clean picture. When pointing the 50mm lens pretty much anywhere outdoors I was getting the most amazing light effects: blobs, swooping arcs, upside down headlights in the sky where they&#039;d obviously reflected somehow inside the glass (there are probably technical terms for these things, but I don&#039;t know them). Sometimes they&#039;re pretty, mostly they&#039;re a pain.</p>
<p>Anyhow, today I finally figured it out, and the answer is simple: just stop the lens down. At anything wider than f/4 you get crazy flares. f/5.6 or higher and things get better. Stop it all the way down to f/22, if you can, and there&#039;s no problem even with bright light sources in the frame. The photo above was 5 seconds, f/22 at ISO200.</p>
<p>So, there you go. Simple. And it only took me three sodding weeks to figure out. Nuts. For my next trick, maybe I&#039;ll learn how to actually take some <em>interesting</em> pictures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.tomroyal.com/blog/2009/01/19/less-lens-flare/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
